To: Amanda Personables
From: Esquilax
Subject: Re: Censorship
Greetings Ms. Personables. While we would ordinarily respect your wishes and remove the relevant material from our publication, certain pictures have recently come into our possession. These pictures clearly show a man matching "T-T's" appearance in the aforementioned pose.
The picture in question is dated October 20, 2006 and the gritty quality of the sand in the photograph indicates that this cannot be the "rounded pink coral sand" that your resort purports to possess. Furthermore, I have just been informed that "Mr. Tawakalna" took the liberty of removing a significant amount of sand from his homeland before his departure, and had it shipped to his current location. No doubt this was an attempt to allow him to have a "little touch of home" to take with him on his travels, and also an attempt to reconstruct one of Tawakalnistan's famous sandpits for his pleasure.
Please find the relevant picture attached, and we look forward to receiving further correspondence from you regarding this matter.
Regards,
E.
Attachment: Type/JPG
-------------------------------------------
ID - I would have thought that ridding the world of cloaked and inebriated malcontents could be justified just as much as declaring war on the Esquilax and his peaceful rabbitkin!
Taw - Hey, it's your fault; you started the conflict with Esquilaxitavia through your rabbit poaching just inside our borders. The peaceful rabbitfolk DID try diplomacy if you recall, but our ambassadors into then Tawakalnistan mysteriously vanished, but we heard later on that there was a State dinner featuring primarily of rabbit. Indeed, you have only yourself to blame... and "Tors". Sheesh, when I think about how this thread started with "Tors" managing to get himself "locked out" (whatever that means) and promises of chilled GB, I still have no idea how the hell we ended up in this state of affairs. In any case, Esquilaxistan is still in our paws, and what are you going to do about it? Huh? Beardo?
AELK - That is certainly an ambiguous comment, and one that I am not prepared to interpret at this time. Unless of course, you would care to elaborate...?