<al-znorphal-haq>

that's how we used to snorffle in Tawakalnistan.

You mean Esquilaxistan.

that's why I said "used to" - it's a heathenistic idolatrous overgrown warren now.

Well Elky, if Para has made a point (and that is doubtful), then it's not a terribly good one, and I'm surprised that you would support it, especially when he has presented no evidence to back up his position.

Edited by - esquilax on 10/28/2006 5:25:53 AM

I disagree. My esteemed colleague and fellow wabbit-hunter, Pawabollicks, has no need to present any evidence whatsoever, especially to you. Firstly, you're a wabbit, and thus outside of the accepted mores of disputa , and secondly, he's simply making an observation, ergo other than his statement he has no a priori requirement to justify his observation.

<znorphals>

Edited by - Tawakalna on 10/28/2006 3:44:27 PM

His post sounded more like a statement of fact than an opinion to me, especially when one analyses his phrasing. Hence, I contend that his statement requires clarification, preferably through the use of explicit evidence. Still, he will not provide any, because 'e ain't got none!

yes he has; I don't like wabbits either

Wat if we had another war? Like, hmm, somone introduce the polar bears or something? The squirrel people are war like, and will not attack our Wabbit brothers, but cant we have some more glorious battles?

Not that I really feel the need to involve myself in the last round of agreed upon disagreement between the two camps but ...

---

...perhaps you are looking to employ my team to perform some underground surveilance

---

---

Bah! I have no need of your services, especially as I have my own teams.

---

---

This is why noone (sic ) likes wabbits.

---

Seems to me that Mr. Parabolix' comment was based upon facts immediately preceding his post.

*nods to AELK*

Edited by - indy11 on 10/29/2006 12:43:58 PM

Taw/Indy - So Shmullah, you are contending that because you agree with Para it somehow legitimises his "argument"? Well, well, don't we have a high opinion of ourselves? Where's your proof? Show me some statistics (or more substantive feedback) that indicate that "nobody" likes rabbits. If you do so, I will accept your and Para's "observation" (to an extent).

And you Indy, siding with "Ali Baba". Shame! As for your quotations, I fail to see the support that they offer the once self-styled "Rabbit Hunter's" statement. Are you arguing that his statement is accurate because I rejected "Tors' " most generous offer of paying for the services of his so-called espionage teams? As a consumer, I have the right to refuse any service at any time, especially when the end product will not be to my liking. Based upon prior discussion, the outcome of hiring the aforementioned teams wouldn't be anything terrible useful, merely the ex-Mullah's robe-size and/or calf measurements, and that's if I'm lucky!

So, in conclusion, Mr. Tools Parabolix' point has not yet been shown to possess any validity. And three of you support it. *Shakes head* I just hope that when you show a little more sagacity when you next vote for your elected officials (if relevent) .

*Rubs paws together* Good, good! This should be interesting, and at least we have moved beyond that damn "head-in-the-sand" thing.... and that's not an excuse to reintroduce it to the conversation! See? I'm on to you, and you, and you. All of you! *Narrows eyes and lays back ears*

Edited by - esquilax on 10/29/2006 3:10:42 PM

you're actually starting to sound even more insanely paranoid than you usually do, and that's paranoid enough. You should get out more, leave the Burrow once in a while

Pawabollycks' statement is a fact, btw, if you take it literally; "nobody" likes wabbits, and it's true - "nobody" does! If you get my drift.... The ERF likes wabbits, and he really is "nobody" - so well done Pawa for picking up on that. Point to our team, I think, or rather, yet another point to our team.

I'm sorry, was it me who was supposed to have my head in the sand? better than down a Burrow, I suppose!

900 Posts. *Shakes head*

My Bird men are watching, waiting for just the right moment, to take on BOTH sides and claim victory. The the skys will be ruled by the rightful ones.

Taw - Paranoid? Who, me? Nah, you must be thinking of that other guy. As for your last post, you still haven't made your sale. Where's yo' proof? And, in any case, if we interpret the statement as you would suggest, then should it be "only nobodies like rabbits"? Hmm? As for ERF, you seem to know him/her/it and his/her/its opinions quite well. My rabbit-sense is tingling! Do I detect a conspiracy? Show yourself ERF!

Final - You can have the skies. Rabbits and ex-Mullahs are land-based (most of the time ). And yes, 900 posts. Here's to 1,000! By the way, is this the longest thread in TLR's history yet, and if not, why not?

Edited by - esquilax on 10/29/2006 5:39:36 PM

I love how I ignore this thread for weeks at a time just because of the sheer amount of posts, and then enter the topic only to post a couple nonsensical things that don't really carry the conversation at all.

Edited by - Wolf_Demon on 10/29/2006 9:28:32 PM