Important Message

You are browsing the archived Lancers Reactor forums. You cannot register or login.
The content may be outdated and links may not be functional.


To get the latest in Freelancer news, mods, modding and downloads, go to
The-Starport

Faster Than Light Travel. Possible?

This is where you can discuss your homework, family, just about anything, make strange sounds and otherwise discuss things which are really not related to the Lancer-series. Yes that means you can discuss other games.

Post Fri Jan 30, 2004 6:22 am

wow, i founded something about tachyon...
read this link

The entire "FTL implies time travel" meme has to do with what's sometimes called "failure of simultaneity at a distance".

Here's a spacetime diagram of a referee (O3) and two duelists (O1 and O2). Space is up/down, time is left/right, in the diagram.


The paths O1 and O2 take through spacetime are the colorcoded arrowed lines. The events in spacetime that each considers "simultaneous" and "8 seconds after the start" are along the thinner, non-arrowed colorcoded lines. So we see that, each of the three observers thinks the other two have slow clocks, and that if we are allowed to move faster than a lightcone, we'll end up going "pastward" in somebody's reckoning.

We can trace out the shots on this diagram, also. Step through it one more time: if green shoots at 8 seconds out, the shot will go along the green "line of simultaneity", and hit blue at 4 seconds elapsed. If blue returns fire from there, it will return along a line paralel to the blue "line of simultaneity", and catch green napping at 2 seconds elapsed.

_________________
Spamius Threadius

Post Fri Jan 30, 2004 10:45 am

@Taw,

I think that this thread was proof that you could do. How else can one explain the time warp

Post Fri Jan 30, 2004 10:55 am

I am NOT going to be dragged into this argument again. FTL is impossible and that's that.

Post Fri Jan 30, 2004 3:37 pm

Faster than light travel impossible
all in favor say I


I

- Wolf_Demon - aka wolfy, wolf, king of odd, king of spam, and twonk

Post Fri Jan 30, 2004 3:48 pm

Aren't we all travelling as fast as light in 4 dimentions? That is 1 time and 3 space dimentions...so when we begin moving we divert more of our time momentum to movement momentum and thus time goes slower...photons have diverted ALL of their time momentum to their energy momentum and thus are the fastest things possible. They do not age or feel time, from when light left the big bang to wherever it is now it has not aged 1 second.

Post Fri Jan 30, 2004 4:26 pm

That would explain why light rarely dissipates. the stars you see at night
are just scale equations over distance instead of light deminishing.

and I have to agree to Taw (as allways) that traveling at or past the speed of light is impossible (yes Taw you heard it right, No more ****y theories about how I can make it possible, this is for real me boy ())

Second, the Black holes, I believe that due to the circumstances it might be possible that our world and universe is the product of a black hole.
Remember the big bang Theory, it stated that before the universe came to be, it existed in a state of maximum compression, and that is just what happens before a supergiant collapses into a black hole. in that picosecond (1.10^-12) between super giant and supernova it exists in a state of Maximum compression, possibly the largest force known in this universe. then when the supernova occurs it might be the big bang on another level of the spacial dimensional realm. ()

__________________________________________________________
Oh, dear, How sad, Never mind!!-Battery Sergeant Major Williams
Plus the newest addition!!-

Post Fri Jan 30, 2004 4:54 pm

you just made that last bit up as you were writing, didn't you?

Post Fri Jan 30, 2004 5:05 pm

Taw to be completely Honest: yes and no
There is mentioning of this theory in books, and yes I made a ****er of a theory as my thoughts got along

Aod

Post Fri Jan 30, 2004 5:15 pm


???? (1.10^-12) ????


my Pentium 4 2.67Ghz just crashed trying to work that out!!!!

BTW FTL not possible end of story, sorry dude (ok that was corny)





Edited by - Aod on 1/30/2004 5:20:34 PM

Post Fri Jan 30, 2004 5:36 pm

1.10^-12 is nothing more then a 1000 billionth of a second
it says 1 times 10 to the minus 12 power. (you write it 0.000000000001 in decimals)

for example nanosecond is a billionth of a second, you write 1.10^-9 as equation
in decimals it would say 0.00000001.

__________________________________________________________
Oh, dear, How sad, Never mind!!-Battery Sergeant Major Williams
Plus the newest addition!!-

Post Fri Jan 30, 2004 5:59 pm

okay... moderators! close this down!!!

ive opened pandoras box here.

jake

Post Fri Jan 30, 2004 6:31 pm

Anyone know anything about String theory?

According to the theorists the string is about the size of a plank length...a millionth of a billionth of a billionth of a centimetre....I think..1.6 x 10^-35 m or 10^-20 times the size of a proton.

Post Sat Jan 31, 2004 3:15 am

Locked per request of thread starter.

Return to Off Topic