Stinger, that is interesting. Do you think I should rewrite my play to include that premise? Then again I suppose old English is hard enough to read for most, why make it harder.

It really is an interesting study, can't see how it's really helpful , but it is really fascinating stuff. Bugger, now I used "really" three times in a sentence. I've been infected by repetition.

Actually, maybe I can see how it's useful. I wonder if that would help in teaching dyslexic people to read? ?lla ta pleh taht t'ndluow rO


Sir Spectre

.... Ours is not to reason why, but to fly or fry!

@ Stinger,

Thats pretty kool, I can read that fairly well.

But it dosn't work on my typo....because mine was a typo on a phonetic spelling.

Life: No one gets out alive.

BTW, the answer to my earlier question in my link thread to this thread in the General Editing Forum, "What is the common irony that connects both 'Much Uba About Nothing' & 'The Taming of the Psycho' and subverts everything in both texts?" I didn't say it exactly like that but that's the jist of it and a better form of the question.

Well the answer is: We mortals (posters) needn't have bothered doing anything except a quick call for the moderators. The whole story and all the ins and outs of our characters chasing these culprits down was all in vein, because we didn't do anything except enjoy the chase and perhaps aggravate the situation.

You read through two texts of drivel about the uselessness of regular posters chasing down interlopers in the forums . At least I made the waste of your time humourous .



Sir Spectre

.... Ours is not to reason why, but to fly or fry!

@Sir Spectre: to me, the most humorous thing in your writings is the modern colloquialisms interwoven into semi-medieval English. the best example of it for me was "Mister Hey, know you that your attitude does suck? ". I laughed to tears! If it were "knowest thee that thy attitude does suck", I probably wouldn't have survived
Excellent work, Sir! Keep it up!

Just remember...if the world didn't suck, we'd all fall off.

Thanks zlo. I wrote these so fast, and this computer of mine doesn't have a good writing program on it so I didn't really finish the stories to the furthest extent they could be. I am a writer, but I write with my laptop not my desktop as this is for all my hobby interests.

I just needed to get back into the writing spirit because I've been busy surviving.

BTW, I included that and other verbal treatments for Lady Excellfire to show she isn't as intelligent as when Denida does her speaking.

Sir Spectre

.... Ours is not to reason why, but to fly or fry!

Edited by - Sir Spectre on 26-09-2003 20:09:09

I siad waht bcsuae i did not udentasrnd waht was gion on

can u raed tihs?

my mood:
oy!: I'm happy
iiieeee!: I'm psycho
dude: I'm not in a very good mood
AHHHH!: I'm mad

Yes I can, but Stinger's tcirk wlapdroy only wkros when the wdros rbeemlse the wdro it is sspoupe to be.

Can you read that?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

"Stinger's trick wordplay only works when the words resemble the word it is suppose to be."


Sir Spectre

.... Ours is not to reason why, but to fly or fry!

Getting back on subject. Has anybody read the play more than once? What parts or aspects of the plays did you enjoy the best? Apart from spelling errors and wrong punctuation, what were things you didn't like about the plays? Is there anything you wished were better than was written?

I'm trying to get feedback in order to hone the craft of my writing.


Sir Spectre

.... Ours is not to reason why, but to fly or fry!

well i'm only in 8th grade so ur way over my head there

my mood:
oy!: I'm happy
iiieeee!: I'm psycho
dude: I'm not in a very good mood
AHHHH!: I'm mad

Wolf, what I mean for example; are there any pieces of the story that weren't funny because the humour was stupid? Things like that. I just want to know from your point of view, maybe I should include a necessity to describe yourself a little bit like you did, Wolf. Then I'll understand your recommendations from your perspective.

The only critics that don't aide the author with his craft are professional critics. I want your un professional critique because you can judge for yourself if you did or didn't like something. Anything. I'm just curious.

If you liked everything and wouldn't change a thing, then I'd like to hear that too.


Sir Spectre

.... Ours is not to reason why, but to fly or fry!

Edited by - Sir Spectre on 27-09-2003 05:06:46

Well, I liked the whole stuff immensely. pity i wasn't there, so I can't compare your masterpiece with the real situation, but then - who cares? It's really good. I dunno which points I could criticise.

Just remember...if the world didn't suck, we'd all fall off.

Well.. It was just as it happened!! And all that olde english speak was great! I cant see any flaws in it.... (And of course my part was greatly satisfactory.......)

BURN CORSAIR BURN!!!!

Excellent Work, Spectrespeare. I must say, thou doth hath a mastery of the Olde English Language.

Let's see some more, and put me in one!!

---

Hey: **** YOU **** YOU **** YOU. YOU GAY SLURT.
Killzone: He is mad, he did not even yell at us with any exclamation marks.

---

Great line.

Edited by - Jim Groovester on 28-09-2003 03:51:24

@Jim Groovester, thanks. That insult was ripped directly from Hey's posts so that was real, which is why I wrote in the comment about the exclamation marks.


Sir Spectre

.... Ours is not to reason why, but to fly or fry!

Edited by - Sir Spectre on 30-09-2003 03:53:27