Is this animal abuse?

Tue Jun 10, 2003 10:57 pm by Leonhart

So what do you think

Tue Jun 10, 2003 11:18 pm by Jim Groovester

Well, that is how you do resesicuatsatate a drowned cat. I suppose in any other circumstance it would be animal abuse.

Tue Jun 10, 2003 11:22 pm by Leonhart

Yeah I guess but think if that cat was to fly from the old mans hand after couple of circles, I bet that would be the first cat on the moo

.

Tue Jun 10, 2003 11:24 pm by Jim Groovester

Now that you think about it, that does sound pretty inhumane.

Tue Jun 10, 2003 11:34 pm by freighter fighter

oh really, and how would you go about resucitating a drowned cat

Tue Jun 10, 2003 11:46 pm by Leonhart

Give it mouth to mouth.

Tue Jun 10, 2003 11:47 pm by Jim Groovester

Yeesh man don't be so serious. But as to how I would go about doing it, I don't have a pool, so I would never ever be in this situation. But If i am in that situation, I'll remember this specific topic. And start whirling the cat around. It'll be a stress releiver for all the pain that you have to go through for taking care of six cats. Seriously.

Wed Jun 11, 2003 12:31 am by Setsuna

If you only drive the water out, then it's helping...
...But if the cat's eyes follow the water... Then it would be abuse.

Also, how do you know when to stop? If you overdo it, you might end up holding only the back legs, while the rest of the cat studies ballistics the hard way...

Careful what you wish... You might just get it.

Wed Jun 11, 2003 12:34 am by Jim Groovester

Maybe when the cat starts screeching would be a pretty good signal that it worked.

'Oh no! Fluffy's drowning! Quick, better get her out!'
woosh woosh woosh woosh woosh woosh woosh
'MMMMMMMMMEEEEEEEOOOOOOOWWWWWWWWWWW!!!!!'
'She's alive!'
'But we hate Fluffy.'
'Nevermind that...'

Edited by - Jim Groovester on 11-06-2003 01:37:06

Wed Jun 11, 2003 12:36 am by Leonhart

Well if the cat does not screech and you keep doing it...I do not wish to think about it, probably srbuja theory would happen.

Edited by - leonhart on 11-06-2003 01:39:46

Wed Jun 11, 2003 12:41 am by Jim Groovester

... then Fluffy is dead and you can be sad., errr, too many edits to posts, thus making it hard and confusing to respond.

Uhh yeah, Cpbuja's theory would probably then occur. Which would then mean that Fluffy is dead and you can be sad.

Edited by - Jim Groovester on 11-06-2003 01:42:01

Wed Jun 11, 2003 1:48 am by Tachyon

Haha, that is one of the funniest pictures I've seen in a while. Ahem, seriously, I don't think it could be considered under those circumstances. I mean, if it's going to die otherwise, I don't really think it would hurt to try. I suppose if I owned a cat and lived near a body of water I would see if theres a proper way to do it, though. I've never really heard of flinging it around

Wed Jun 11, 2003 1:49 am by maswastage|BG

err..so is he supposed to be saving that cat?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Wed Jun 11, 2003 1:51 am by Leonhart

Probably, but I dont think cat will be wolking for some while bones will be pulled out.

Wed Jun 11, 2003 3:53 am by Huffer

Who ever heard of a cat drowing anyway? Damn things always seem to survive just about everything.

Important Message

You are browsing the archived Lancers Reactor forums. You cannot register or login.
The content may be outdated and links may not be functional.

To get the latest in Freelancer news, mods, modding and downloads, go to
The-Starport