Sexism, a mathematical possibility

Sat May 06, 2006 7:30 am by The Evil Thing

If we consider the follow statement:
Girls = Time and Money
=> Girls = Time x Money
We know that Time equals Money
=> Girls = (Money)^2
We also know that money is the root of all evil
=> Money = (Evil)^0.5
=> Girls = ((Evil)^0.5)^2
=> Girls = Evil

Q.E.D

N.B. I've put Evil to the power of 0.5 because there is no square root sign that I can get to work on the forums.

I'm not evil, I'm morally challenged

Edited by - The Evil Thing on 5/6/2006 8:31:27 AM

Sat May 06, 2006 8:06 am by NuttyProSci-Fi3000

Too True!!! (title needs changing)

Edited by - NuttyProSci-Fi3000 on 5/6/2006 9:25:04 AM

Sat May 06, 2006 8:49 am by sycho warrior

hmmz...a friend of mine claims to have had part in creating that equation...

though I have a slight problem with one of the statements...

"We also know that money is the root of all evil"

I beg to differ here...money is not the root of all evil...the love for money is the root of all evil...

Sat May 06, 2006 9:07 am by The Evil Thing

Your friend may well have come up with a similar statement.

You know what they say about great minds...

EDIT: Nutty, I chose that title because it spoofs the title of one of Chips' threads. Even if he did miss out a comma.

Edited by - The Evil Thing on 5/6/2006 10:08:18 AM

Sat May 06, 2006 9:22 am by Chips

Meh, I personally found that old old Chemistry one was much much better

Dr. Schambaugh, of the University of Oklahoma School of Chemical Engineering, Final Exam question for May of 1997. Dr. Schambaugh is known for asking questions such as, "why do airplanes fly?" on his final exams. His one and only final exam question in May 1997 for his Momentum, Heat and Mass Transfer II class was: "Is hell exothermic or endothermic? Support your answer with proof."

Most of the students wrote proofs of their beliefs using Boyle's Law or some variant. One student, however, wrote the following:

"First, We postulate that if souls exist, then they must have some mass. If they do, then a mole of souls can also have a mass. So, at what rate are souls moving into hell and at what rate are souls leaving? I think we can safely assume that once a soul gets to hell, it will not leave.

Therefore, no souls are leaving. As for souls entering hell, let's look at the different religions that exist in the world today. Some of these religions state that if you are not a member of their religion, then you will go to hell. Since there are more than one of these religions and people do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that all people and souls go to hell. With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in hell to increase exponentially.

Now, we look at the rate of change in volume in hell. Boyle's Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in hell to stay the same, the ratio of the mass of souls and volume needs to stay constant. Two options exist:
If hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls enter hell, then the temperature and pressure in hell will increase until all hell breaks loose.
If hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until hell freezes over.

So which is it? If we accept the quote given to me by Theresa Manyan during Freshman year, "that it will be a cold night in hell before I sleep with you" and take into account the fact that I still have NOT succeeded in having sexual relations with her, then Option 2 cannot be true...Thus, hell is exothermic."

Edited by - Chips on 5/6/2006 4:57:41 PM

Sat May 06, 2006 9:12 pm by J Dawg

The statement regarding girls and evil has, I believe, been around since the invention of analytic geometry. You're by no means the first to come up with this, but its clever, nonetheless.

Sun May 07, 2006 3:30 pm by 007

lol, i love that old chemistry one, it rules!

might have to keep that one...

007

Sun May 07, 2006 3:41 pm by H.Q. Victor

Or the alternative -

Girls = Future and love
=> Girls = Time x nurturing
We know that Time equals investment
=> Girls = (love)^2
We also know that love covers a multitude of sins
=> love = (good)^0.5
=> Girls = (good)^0.5)^2
=> Girls = a future and good life

Sun May 07, 2006 8:30 pm by RILMS

I've seen the first one many times...still funny though.

As for:

"Girls = Future and love
=> Girls = Time x nurturing
We know that Time equals investment
=> Girls = (love)^2
We also know that love covers a multitude of sins
=> love = (good)^0.5
=> Girls = (good)^0.5)^2
=> Girls = a future and good life"

How does future and love = time x nurturing?

How does investment = (love)^2?

That whole equasion is confusing...i agree with the end result...but math is off...

Life: No one gets out alive.

Mon May 08, 2006 1:37 am by H.Q. Victor

"Girls = Future and love (girls are apart of both a future and love)
=> Girls = Time x nurturing (Relationships take time to happen and nuturing to develope)
We know that Time equals investment
=> Girls = (love)^2 (You provide twice the love to girls that you do other things)
We also know that love covers a multitude of sins
=> love = (good)^0.5 (Love is always a good thing, but some hold back on it)
=> Girls = (good)^0.5)^2 Girls, are an intrical part of the future and what they mean to you)
=> Girls = a future and good life" (Therefore, girls are apart of our future and together, you have agood life)

Edited by - Finalday on 5/8/2006 2:37:40 AM

Important Message

You are browsing the archived Lancers Reactor forums. You cannot register or login.
The content may be outdated and links may not be functional.

To get the latest in Freelancer news, mods, modding and downloads, go to
The-Starport