Important Message

You are browsing the archived Lancers Reactor forums. You cannot register or login.
The content may be outdated and links may not be functional.


To get the latest in Freelancer news, mods, modding and downloads, go to
The-Starport

a cautionary tale for gameheads

This is where you can discuss your homework, family, just about anything, make strange sounds and otherwise discuss things which are really not related to the Lancer-series. Yes that means you can discuss other games.

Post Tue Apr 25, 2006 7:36 am

a cautionary tale for gameheads

so when parents say you are gaming too much maybe its time to listen



over the top.








Edited by - [steel on 4/25/2006 8:48:55 AM

Post Tue Apr 25, 2006 9:12 am


Langenderfer is in the Pinellas County jail charged with one count of attempted murder, (accused of trying to kill his son, not the computer.)


He was lucky, if I have a 22 year old son still living at home, his little back side would be off at work, not sitting at home.

Post Tue Apr 25, 2006 9:39 am

Some people just don't get it, if you are trying to shoot some-one practice in a game before hand.

Post Tue Apr 25, 2006 9:45 am

Let's be fair on the parent here, he most certainly wasn't trying to kill his son so why is he being charged as such? Criminal damage at the most, surely?

Final, what would you do if said individual got a job as a playtester?


I'm not evil, I'm morally challenged

Post Tue Apr 25, 2006 10:10 am

I doubt that charge will hold tbh... no-one is that an incompetant shot as to miss by 3 FEET.

Post Tue Apr 25, 2006 10:43 am

Chips, he obviously had not practiced in a game.

Post Tue Apr 25, 2006 11:15 am

I agree with "NuttyProSci-Fi3000", He needs to practice more.

Post Fri Apr 28, 2006 9:48 am

The funny part about this whole thing, is that they say that he was charged with attempted murder and then feel the need to clarify it is the murder of his son and not the computer!

Post Fri Apr 28, 2006 10:02 am

Shows how seriously they're taking it, eh?

Post Sat Apr 29, 2006 8:26 pm

Oh boy, you know Jack Thompson's gonna get involved at some point. I can just see him now. "We must ban all violent games because they can even turn people who don't play them into psychopaths. Violent games made a good father try to kill his son because his son was playing the game." I'd be willing to bet money that that's about how Jack Thompson thinks. At least I had a good lawyer and got that lawsuit he had agains me dropped.



I hope I didn't brain my damage!

Can someone explain to me why it's perfectly legal to put up instructions for building an atomic bomb on the Internet, but it's a federal offence to post a way to get around copy protection on CDs?

Post Mon May 01, 2006 4:12 pm

Sorry to hijack this thread, but as its starting to decompose and get a little odiferous, I won't feel too guilty...


Killa, any chance you can explain this about Jack Thompson having a case against you?

Post Wed May 03, 2006 1:18 pm

...not if I hijack it first!

RE: Your sig, Killa;
You want to know why it is legal to put plans for an atomic bomb on the internet but not warez (not strictly what you asked but I can't be stuffed typing that out)? Two reasons come to mind, firstly intellectual property is (potentially) violated in the latter, but not the former. Secondly, there is a reasonable expectation/hope that the people who get hold of these plans don't actually have the raw materials necessary to build a bomb, but it is highly likely that someone who gains access to warez will indeed have the means to make good use of his acquisition.

Sorry, J Dawg, you asked a question, but that's been bugging me for some time now

007

Post Sun May 07, 2006 3:47 pm

thats just rediculous, and it seems to me that the guys attorney has some room to play, that they would have to point out that he was trying to shoot his son, and not the moniter, like he claimed...

007

Voilà! In view, a humble vaudevillian veteran, cast vicariously as both victim and villain by the vicissitudes of Fate.The only verdict is vengeance; a vendetta, held as a votive, not in vain, for the value and veracity of such shall one day vindicate the vigilant and the virtuous. Verily, this vichyssoise of verbiage veers most verbose vis-à-vis an introduction, and so it is my very good honor to meet you and you may call me V.

V from V for Vendetta

Post Sun May 07, 2006 5:54 pm

of course he may have been playing the sims
in which case the father was justified in his actions and should be jaled for missing :p

Post Sun May 07, 2006 8:00 pm

J Dawg-long story, explained it a while ago, and I really don't feel like going through it again. Let's just say it had something to do with a tiny little AIM icon I put on a freewebs site I made.

Evil- thanks for ruining it for me, it was more of a rhetorical question. I suppose I shouldn't have said nukes, maybe it should have been more practical bombs that can be made at home. That's completely legal. I just would have hoped that Republicans had more important things to deal with than making it a federal offence to get around copy protection on CDs, maybe they should be focusing on national defence or the borders, or maybe that war in Iraq wich they had no buisness starting?

[steel- sorry for the off topic post.


Edited by - Killa on 5/7/2006 9:08:19 PM

Return to Off Topic