but its great in maths class, where when the teacher says parralel lines must not touch, i can say well actually they do
That sentence led me to believe that if you brought this up in class and contradicted what the teacher was trying to teach to the rest of them via your superior intellect... you would be disrupting said class.
That is a fact, not theory
My concern wasn't for your education, it was everyone else who would have to suffer your disruption... (if you did undertake that in class).
As for whether you are more intelligent than some of us (me) - no doubt you are, I didn't infer you weren't... but it doesn't mean people won't understand the concepts. Stephen Hawking wrote "A brief history of time" - specifically to explain physics concepts upon the origins of the universe etc. You didn't need to be a theoretical physicist to understand his text at all... it was for the common layman.
However, your statement that we couldn't understand it is making assumptions.
Kind of reminds me when we went to hospital due to a girl having a brain haemorrage. The doctor was trying to describe some process or something and said "I won't explain the process, because you'd need to be a particle physicist to understand". The girls aunt promptly said "I am a particle physicist - explain away".
In other words, don't underestimate your unknown audience .