well thanks MS, for providing me with knowledge I already knew, I was talking about the message it spreads, the complete philosophy behind it, the social adaptation stinks a bit, I know that, but in all ways well argumented MS ( I knew there was a reason why Wiz labeled me a fair substitute for you
)
anyway, Communism in itself, isn't bad, considering the message it spreads, however, there is one fundamental difference between socialists and Communists.
Socialists, are much more oriented onto equalizing the rights for all, and trying by liberal means, to establish a government, that consists of workers, historically speaking, Communism, is a child of Socialism, However, both share the same grandfather<s>: Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, these two founded a movement called the social democracy, the movement still exists today, and believes in democratic evolutionary rather then revolution, it wants to establish a workers government that encompasses the rights for all, and wants all to have the equal share of a profit.
you have probably all heard the term Bolshevhik
Communism was "founded" at the party congress in 1903, where a majority of Voters (Bolshevhiki, means Majority voter) moved for more radical action, and had more radical views upon marxism, born was the marxist-leninist movement, Lenin took the core of Marxist theory, and improved it, Communism in itself, is based on needs, or as he (Marx) said it: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need." (source Wikipedia.org) that is the basis of Communism, where your argument comes into view, I myself Follow Lenin, in the idea that the Communist Ideleogy should be spearheaded and propagated by the intellectuals and workers, organised in a Communist party.
Communists are more Revolutionary oriented, The Revolution is in itself a Means to form and establish a Proletarian dictature, as a transgression to the community, where all means of production are communal property, where there is no difference between you or your neighbour, you are all equal and each have an equal share.
Your argument, that of Communism promoting Lazyness, is in itself correct, but not fully correct, "Why work harder then my slackoff neighbour, when I get the same share handed out to me" you only forget one thing, the main Gaol of Communism in my view is to work to better the community, not for own benefit, by your own means, sure, the next man may not do as much as I do on a daily basis, but I work to better the community, I do not work for myself, I work for that next man, so he has a dinner for him his wife and six children, and so he can provide them with clothes, thats why I work, and that is for me the basis of Communism, to work for the next man, so he can provide them with what he needs, and in turn that guy before me does the same to me (in a communist Society that is
)
(sorry for the long winded thesis, I hope its worth it, btw, sorry for the flag
)
_____________________________