Important Message

You are browsing the archived Lancers Reactor forums. You cannot register or login.
The content may be outdated and links may not be functional.


To get the latest in Freelancer news, mods, modding and downloads, go to
The-Starport

Its official, scientists are bored...

This is where you can discuss your homework, family, just about anything, make strange sounds and otherwise discuss things which are really not related to the Lancer-series. Yes that means you can discuss other games.

Post Fri May 28, 2004 8:02 am

Its official, scientists are bored...

Beachcombing scientists have come up with what they say is the formula for building the perfect sandcastle.
After combing the beaches of Britain, they came up with OW = 0.125 x S. Put simply, that means you need to use eight times as much sand as water.

They said any more water meant the walls were too soggy and any less meant the sand wouldn't bind together.

The scientists also figured out which beach had the best sand for castles, rating Torquay as number one.

Top beaches

Bridlington, Great Yarmouth and Bournemouth also did well, because of their fine grained sand.

Beaches were also judged on how clean the beach was and how good the sand looked.

Professor Matthew Bennett, who led the study, said: "If people get the water-sand combination right, they will have hours of fun."

Post Fri May 28, 2004 8:05 am

Since when was Sandcastle building classified as a science?

I am the Master of Disaster!!!!!!!!

Post Fri May 28, 2004 8:30 am

if you pour sand down freely from your hand or something.. the angle that the slope makes with the horizontal plane is 55 degrees or something. they call it the naturl inclination or something..

Post Fri May 28, 2004 8:44 am

And then we wonder why other things like Cancer research arent making any progress? These guys are abusing their research budget to go play on beaches and build sandcastles. What a load

"The present is theirs; the future, for which I really worked, is mine." - Nikola Tesla

Post Fri May 28, 2004 10:11 am

Hmm, you think thats bad? They worked out the correct angle to dunk biscuits at so that the biscuit won't break (basically an angle that allows one side to stay dry whilst the other dunks...) and also the famous two year investigation into why toast lands "butter side down" - from which they found that.....it didn't.. - not always anyway .

There are other fantastically useless wastes of money as well - its really dumb. Spend money on cancer research......or on sand castles. Worst thing is that the toast one was funded with lottery money if i remember rightly.....and since the lottery STILL refuse to grant donations to medical charities like Cancer Research and so forth, it really gets under my collar that they helped to fund such a monumentally pile of crap research such as that.

Edited by - Chips on 5/28/2004 11:11:54 AM

Post Fri May 28, 2004 10:15 am

Well, cancer may never be cured (indeed, if it was, people would be near immortal, population would skyrocket etc. so it's probably better it isn't cured), and this research probably had a budget of around £4, since all it would require is a days work and a few simple equations.

Besides, the perfect sand castle depends on what kinda castle you want it to be, a desert fortress, for example, wouldn't look right unless it was nearly all waterless, as the colour would be wrong.


Well, this is my new sig. Small. Doesn't do any tricks either. No bouncing up or down or spinning... Bah. Youths these days, with all their bright lights and shiny wossnames...mumble....mumble.

Post Fri May 28, 2004 10:20 am

How can ppl waste their time like that?


Trying to hack into hell wont help, they put up extra firewalls
sycho_warrior Forum Systems Chapter 8

Post Fri May 28, 2004 10:35 am

Hell I'd LOVE to do that!

The thing isall these diseases = useful since we cannot cure them thereby allowing humanity to be pruned. And yes I know how sad and tragic it is, but I accept it and move on. The thing is statisically where would everyone live if these diseases were eradicated?

Post Fri May 28, 2004 11:25 am

Actually, even if all cancers were cured, we'd still die in the end. Our physical make up does not (yet) include a means to perpetually replace cells that die. Slowly, the ability for our cells to replicate weakens until they stop altogether.

But it is true that we'd live a lot longer. Question being whether the "end" period, whatever that may be, is something any of us really want to experience as it drags on.

Post Fri May 28, 2004 12:31 pm

In Canada, we had our scientests checking out if cow farts significantly dammaged the O-Zone Layer.

Life: No one gets out alive.

Post Fri May 28, 2004 12:40 pm

Think about it, at least this stuff is semi practical. Look at NASA and the European space agency's budget. They can determine how fast a star is moving away from earth that is impossible to see without uber x ray telescopes in orbit. Woo-hoo. However, next time I'm at the beach, this stuff will come in handy. Besides, it makes us smile a bit, and you can't put a price on happiness.

And cossair, colour? (Just a dumb yank laughing at a Brit). Although you do raise a good point about building an accurate desert fortress. --- VH16

Post Fri May 28, 2004 12:41 pm

However we can now almost freeze cells from dieing

Post Fri May 28, 2004 12:50 pm

The points about cancer being useful sometimes are somewhat valid, but if you got cancer and you faced your own slow, painful death, or even worse, faced a slow, painful cure. It's likely you'd change your opinion.

I am just a worthless liar,
I am just an imbecile,
I will only complicate you,
Trust in me and fall as well.

Post Fri May 28, 2004 12:52 pm

Not really since I hate this Plane and would lloooove to get off it

Post Fri May 28, 2004 2:57 pm

Really? So you'd like to get off it in a slow and painful method. Why don't you simply end your life if you hate this existance so much?

I am just a worthless liar,
I am just an imbecile,
I will only complicate you,
Trust in me and fall as well.

Return to Off Topic