Important Message

You are browsing the archived Lancers Reactor forums. You cannot register or login.
The content may be outdated and links may not be functional.


To get the latest in Freelancer news, mods, modding and downloads, go to
The-Starport

Martha

This is where you can discuss your homework, family, just about anything, make strange sounds and otherwise discuss things which are really not related to the Lancer-series. Yes that means you can discuss other games.

Post Fri Mar 05, 2004 12:16 pm

MARTHA HAS BEEN FOUND GUILTY!

On all 4 counts that were left on her indictment amounting to conspiring to obstruct an investigation by deceiving investigators of her reasons for dumping Imclone stocks.

Her company Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia was once worth a market capitalization of over $2Billion, this morning it was at $700Million... but this may change for less now.

She probably now will attempt an appeal.

Edited by - Indy11 on 3/5/2004 12:39:19 PM

Post Fri Mar 05, 2004 1:05 pm

Before the verdict was announced on Foxnews, they were saying that her stock went up 20%. I wonder who was making the money and who was foolish to pay that much more, Hmmm?

Finalday

Habaq Mot / Aspazomai Thanatos / Capere Obitus... /Keith Green\ (1953-1983)

Post Fri Mar 05, 2004 3:24 pm

This is a major victory for the ppl of the US, kinda, maybe, sort of, yeah. It's a good thing, now all you other celebrity embezeler will know to stop, you know who you are.

I had a super Ego, but it was pestering me so I killed it.

Post Fri Mar 05, 2004 5:31 pm

<Enters from stage left. Sets down soap box. Steps up>

Well. I guess it makes for a good example of justice working in the right direction but we have much bigger fish to fry. Anybody remember Enron? Do we all realize that the biggest fish in that cesspool is still free of any indictment? Ken Lay, the guy who was in charge of the whole thing before and after Skilling is still at large and without indictment. Where is the justic in that? The Imclone scandal hit AFTER Enron, and Martha Stewart, a person who basically took advantage of a privileged arrangement illegally kept herself from losing too much money by dumping her stock before the rest of the public had a chance to get the news and make trades.

Ken Lay arranged to bilk his company of hundreds of millions of dollars, bankrupted his employees' pension and retirement accounts, and still lives the life of Riley free and without public taint or scorn. Where is the justice in that?

<Steps down. Picks up soap box. exeunt stage right >

Post Fri Mar 05, 2004 5:35 pm

But, Martha just sold extra stock she had, not the stock of her own company. Most of the enron people are being punished and Lay will get his, even if its in civil court.

Finalday

Habaq Mot / Aspazomai Thanatos / Capere Obitus... /Keith Green\ (1953-1983)

Post Fri Mar 05, 2004 5:37 pm

Exactly my point. That's all that Martha did.

If Ebbers is suitable for criminal prosecution for what he did at Worldcom, it seems to me that Lay is equally culpable. Don't be sure about Lay. He has very powerful friends. One happens to live in the White House, you know.

Edited by - Indy11 on 3/5/2004 5:53:28 PM

Post Sat Mar 06, 2004 8:48 am

Well, she's guilty. I have to admit, I'm abit supprised.

Life: No one gets out alive.

Post Sat Mar 06, 2004 9:59 am

Would she have been convicted if Lord Chief Justice Indy had been there? or might she have gone dahn for longer?

Post Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:21 pm

Depends on what thejudge told the jury to consider. One of the jurors who agreed to be interviewed afterward (the twit) said that his view of the case was influenced by the fact that all these celebrities kept showing up in the court audience in show of support for Martha. He felt that he needed to strike a blow for the common man.

While I understand his emotional reaction, I think he should have kept his fat mouth shut because, basically, he as much as admitted that it wasn't the facts that persuaded him to vote guilty, it was that he didn't like the fact that Martha was a celebrity. Bias anyone?

Anyway, I think it is true that she lied in a foolish attempt to keep herself from coming under investigation. Pretty stupid move. So I think I'd have found her guilty if that is what the instructions from the judge required.

As it stands, the Securities and Exchange Commission still has its suit against her open and pending. This is a civil law suit for civil damages and penalies. This is the case that says that she acted on insider information and dumped her stock.

So her plight is far from over.

Oh yeah. And her attornies are appealing the criminal conviction.

Post Sat Mar 06, 2004 2:48 pm

so is she in pokey yet or what? can she wear all that designer stuff in jail?

and if her firm goes under, will all the gear and stuff be sold off cheap, maybe in the first week of this April?

Edited by - Tawakalna on 3/6/2004 2:57:33 PM

Post Sat Mar 06, 2004 4:04 pm

As for punishment. If they put her in prison, the company will suffer, including all those that it employes. She could be fined and work a lot of comunity service. Stations have already dropped her show, which is punishing the other stock holders unfairly. *picks up soap box, exit's stage left*....

Finalday

Hinneh / I / Bo / Mahar... /Keith Green\ (1953-1983)

Post Sun Mar 07, 2004 6:15 pm

An update on martha

Finalday

Hinneh / I / Bo / Mahar... /Keith Green\ (1953-1983)

Post Mon Mar 08, 2004 6:00 am

Hmmm. Don't know if Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia will have gone afloat belly up as early as April but I'll watch for it and let you know.

I don't think (not sure) that she is doing any jail time as someone in her situation ordinarily is released on her own recognizance pending sentencing. She has not been sentenced yet. She ought not do time. I don't see how her actions warrant jail time but a hefty fine and community service, like Fd said, seems more appropriate.

I think the appeal will be interesting. 1) She likely will have new attorneys who will argue that she was poorly represented at trial. 2) Jury bias may be argued too. As well as other technical errors, if any, on the judge's denial of her motions to have the entire case against her dismissed.

Edited by - Indy11 on 3/8/2004 6:05:49 AM

Post Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:58 pm

I didn't care about this case too much at first, but I started caring more because I wanted to see at least one celebrity get sent to prison. It's nice to know that at least one person can't beat the justice system with their wallet. Maybe I'm just still bitter because OJ got off.

Let's get those missiles ready to destroy the universe!!

Post Mon Mar 08, 2004 7:42 pm

Martha Its a shame that people make bad choices with stock. The company, Omnimedia, still has a good product. Nothing has changed. The figurehead has trouble, not the structure. Money makers can turn it around if they wanted to and probaly will down the road.

Finalday

Hinneh / I / Bo / Mahar... /Keith Green\ (1953-1983)

Edited by - Finalday on 3/8/2004 7:42:30 PM

Return to Off Topic