Important MessageYou are browsing the archived Lancers Reactor forums. You cannot register or login. |
Video Card
This is where you can discuss your homework, family, just about anything, make strange sounds and otherwise discuss things which are really not related to the Lancer-series. Yes that means you can discuss other games.
24 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
@all of u
So I should not get GEFORCE FX5600 and should get
Geforce-4 TI4800 SE 128 MB 8X
or
ATI Radeon
or
HL2
Lol u guys are conusing me
You're Alucard, the vaguely evil star of Hellsing that is both revered and feared. Always ready to laugh at the weaknessess of others, you can be downright cruel. Lurking underneath all that bitterness, however, is a strong sense of justice and concern for those you care about.
Leonhart
General of a clan
Leader of UltraLeon Works
So I should not get GEFORCE FX5600 and should get
Geforce-4 TI4800 SE 128 MB 8X
or
ATI Radeon
or
HL2
Lol u guys are conusing me
You're Alucard, the vaguely evil star of Hellsing that is both revered and feared. Always ready to laugh at the weaknessess of others, you can be downright cruel. Lurking underneath all that bitterness, however, is a strong sense of justice and concern for those you care about.
Leonhart
General of a clan
Leader of UltraLeon Works
@Leonhart, lol , HL2 is Half Life 2 I think. I never played the original game, but its not a video card.
I've been checking on prices and the ATI 9600 PRO 128MB DDR AGP 8x is just a smidge more expensive than the Gf4 TI4800. I think the others are right in saying the ATI Radeon is a better card. I hear it a lot more lately. It wasn't always the case.
DO NOT GET your initial choice, the GEFORCE FX5600 128MB AGP 8X DDR. That just is a bad card for being a newer design. That is an absolute & definite "no."
Sir Spectre
... No more signature.
Edited by - Sir Spectre on 10-11-2003 06:23:35
I've been checking on prices and the ATI 9600 PRO 128MB DDR AGP 8x is just a smidge more expensive than the Gf4 TI4800. I think the others are right in saying the ATI Radeon is a better card. I hear it a lot more lately. It wasn't always the case.
DO NOT GET your initial choice, the GEFORCE FX5600 128MB AGP 8X DDR. That just is a bad card for being a newer design. That is an absolute & definite "no."
Sir Spectre
... No more signature.
Edited by - Sir Spectre on 10-11-2003 06:23:35
I usually ran across when the Radeon 9800 Pro came out was that it needed more than 128Mb of video memory. Double the volume to 256Mb was a common suggestion. Again, however, that was for the 9800 Pro. Can it make a difference? Like say for HL2 if it ever comes out?
Lets put it this way: Imagine you have a texture 128x128 pixels in size, 32-bit pallete, 32bit texture depth. You would need *deep breath* (128x32)+(128x32)+(128x32)x32x8x8 (x,y,z,color,T&L,bump mapping) bits = 24MB for storing and processing that texture in one cycle. Original HL has an average texture size 64x64 and in some cases 96x96, and assuming that HL2 will use 128x128-256x256, yes, the quantity of memory COULD make a difference, but with high speed DDR (4 ns and faster) that difference between 128 and 256MB of mem shouldn't be more than, say 5-15%, depending on the vid card.
I bought a GeForce MXX 440 Sparkle 4x AGP for £64 from PC World.
-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-
Juni: "From such humble beginnings your head grew to its present size?"
http://www.cardamine.net/
-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-
Juni: "From such humble beginnings your head grew to its present size?"
http://www.cardamine.net/
24 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2