Sat Sep 27, 2003 5:55 am by Sir Spectre
Smash the officer's brains in with one of gold bricks. Then proceed to take two across then come back for the third.
This is all assuming the person is very strong and can carry all three bricks at a time while running from the law, who fat on donuts must be much slower to not catch him.
As for the bridge not being able to support his weight with three bricks means it's most likely a foot path bridge to merely make crossing a stream easier for normal hikers so he could just wade in the water to the other side.
If all that fails, hire a Leer jet to take you to the other side.
Or just tie your shirt around them and drag them across so as to distribute the weight of the bricks. A shirt will last long enough to do that.
If you want to get technical, gold doesn't come in bricks, they come in bars so the man stole worthless gold decorated building bricks.
If you're a nice guy and don't want to smash the officer's brains in, then leave one brick behind so he will pick it up as evidence and take it to the lab for fingerprinting, and hopefully the lab is on the other side of the bridge and if you're ballsy enough you can go get it. Who would ever think you would hijack evidence from a police lab?
Or you can do what kimk said, find another way.
Or does it all come down to your using the word "You" which implies the reader and I know I have never stolen 3 gold bricks so I wouldn't ever be in that situation, problem solved.
Or is it perhaps the case that I inferred incorrectly being chased by the law meant by an officer. It could be that the "law" chases criminals for criminal acts, but not physically because it is just words on paper, so the culprit could take his time in getting across the bridge without the fear of being chased at that particular moment by officers.
Sir Spectre
.... Ours is not to reason why, but to fly or fry!
Edited by - Sir Spectre on 27-09-2003 07:42:18