any one what to start a sever just ask what they sould get i can help.

later


p.s dont look behind u

please tell me what i need to start a server, i really wanna start one, but i dont know what i need. it would supposrt about 34, well around that, so what Specs and stuff would i need?. thanks.

Hi, I want to start LAN server on a 100 Mbit line, the machine will be either a Celeron 433 Mhz with 128 megs or an Athlon TB with 1333 Mhz and 256 or 512 megs. has anybody made some experience with such a machine or a similar one and could tell me how many players it can handle?

Has anybody an idea how i can set FLserver to a specific port?

I used to run it with the "Run FLserver as service"-tool to get it working on that specific port, but I wanted to use IFSO (IONCROSS Server Operator for those who don't know) now, but I can't set it to a specific port - or can I by command line? If yes, could you please tell me what the command line for that is?

From the FLserver icon add in the target section EXE\flserver.exe /p2302 change 2302 for what ever port you need.

In IFSO in configuration settings - FLserver command line option just add /p2302 change 2302 for what ever port you need.

mouse how much do you plan to spend on it. to support about 34 people you sould consider a P4. 800mhz fsb with 1 meg of l2. make sure its got HT. (makes it run like a duel prosser.) about 1 gig of ram. if you can get 2gigs. onbord graphics and sound will do fine. go to new egg and get a mobo for a socket 478 P4 with HT. make sure it can support at least a gig of ram and has pci slots and an agp slot. any thing else from you just ask.

the dude with the celron. i have a celron based computer that i run a sever on. i also play the game on that computer. a celron can play about 10 people np as long as its lan and cloking in at about 2.5ghrz. the speed you gave me i think is the fsb. (front side bus the speed the thing runs stock.) if it has 128 megs of ram take ten and make it 6. for the Athlon TB i dont know much about that one. but with that ram and speed i gess about 15 to 20 people np.


the next guy srry but i dont understand the queston. i dont mess with port # my computer does this stuff on its own. it loks like someone else helped you. thax you person.

later


p.s dont look behind u

to support about 34 people you sould consider a P4. 800mhz fsb with 1 meg of l2. make sure its got HT.

Or better yet an AMD64 3200/3400 series.

yea an amd 64 will kick ass vs a p4. only thing is that it has not HT. that lets it do two things at one time without any lagg. also the p4 is not as much money as a p4. one more thing theres (that i know of) a 64bit sever os. so your working a 64 bit things like a 32bit thing. but your right the amd is better then a p4 if you can offred it. just make sure the prosser you get is at least 2.6ghz more is better.

later


p.s dont look behind u

yea an amd 64 will kick ass vs a p4.

I agree.

only thing is that it has not HT.

Yeah it has HyperTransport, not to mention more IPC (Instructions Per Cycle)

hat lets it do two things at one time without any lagg.

That also has a lot to do with RAM, However the P4 is clearly better than the AMD64 series in PCMARK04, and business applications.

also the p4 is not as much money as a p4

I know what you meant.

one more thing theres (that i know of) a 64bit sever os. so your working a 64 bit things like a 32bit thing.

Yes, not to mention if you have a 64bit processor you can run a trial beta version of Windows Longhorn

but your right the amd is better then a p4 if you can offred it. just make sure the prosser you get is at least 2.6ghz more is better.

AMD CPU's is better than Intel CPU's at any pricepoint excluding the AMD XP series and the Intel Dothan series.

srry for all the typos. the keybord at my school is sticky. any way is that what amd calls hyper transport. well then evry one buy a amd 64. but i have nothing to say for the older 32 bit ones. i have a p3 and a p4 at home so i have never beachmarked a amd system other then a 64 FX for my freand. with the same stuff on the computer the only problum with the amd lines are the ram support. amd does not upport all the types of ram out there. if you buy an amd system you have to buy a new psu and new ram. the intel side of things are easyer to upgrade cuz theres not so many sokets. intel makes things for the 478 soket and thats about it for the time bean. so if you can buy a amd 64 but i have to recomend a p4. its the less expensive more upgradeable and all around easyer to use. also the p4 gets about 4.2ghz vs the amds 2.3 or somthing like that. hay the guys that knows stuff do you have a sever or somthing.

later


p.s dont look behind u

the keybord at my school is sticky.

*Doesnt Ask*

if you buy an amd system you have to buy a new psu and new ram.

Since when?, You have to get new RAM and a new Power Supply if you run AMD's Opterons, but not AMDFX/64 series..

intel makes things for the 478 soket and thats about it for the time bean.

Intel uses Socket 478 and 755(PCI-E Motherboards), AMD uses 939 and 754. (940 for AMDFX-51 and Opterons)

so if you can buy a amd 64 but i have to recomend a p4. its the less expensive more upgradeable and all around easyer to use.

You been spending lots of time whit the local Dell "Dude"?
The Exact opposite of what you just said is true.. go to newegg.com and choose CPU's AMD's are Faster and cheaper.

lso the p4 gets about 4.2ghz vs the amds 2.3 or somthing like that. hay the guys that knows stuff do you have a sever or somthing.

GHz doesnt mean anything.. as I've said before: AMD had mmore Instructions Per Clock Cycle(IPC) and better architecture.. Intel's plan was to throw more GHz and Cache while upping the spped of the FSB(Front Side Bus).. However recently dell has changed their plan.. most likely to dual-core CPU's..

I would be Intel If I wanted to add to 'my' "Folding" team..

Read more about it : Click here

ok when i said the thing about the ram and psu i ment from a intel. (srry but ip till now i almost never consederd a AMD system.) im gessing that like me your a fanboy of AMD but im Intel. lol. any way 64fxs and the other 64 are more expensive then p4s. get the XPs then your fine there a bit less expensive then P4s. (i think there called XP if not tell me. im not vary good at keeping track of lots of letters and #s.)
hay what are your system specs. what games does it play well. i just what to know if i sould get an amd. (im geting a new one soon any way.)
my system specs

2.49ghz celron (this thing sucks)
256megs of ram
64meg video on mobo
56k modem
100/10 lan
40gig hard drive 7200rpm

this runs freelancer with every thing up at about 4 fps. with the setttings iplay at it will play at like 30-40fps.
at halo i can turn every thing down and get about 12-20fps.
farcry at 1fps lol

im gessing that like me your a fanboy of AMD but im Intel. lol. any way 64fxs and the other 64 are more expensive then p4s.lol

No. Infact I was an Intel fanboy a while back.. I just go wit hte fastest, cheapest processor.

Yes AMD's are more Expensive than some Intel.. as in a AMD64 3500+ is more expensive than a Intel P4 2.0(A)GHz processor.. but the 3500+ is cheaper and faster than the Intel 3.4(E)GHz.

hay what are your system specs. what games does it play well. i just what to know if i sould get an amd. (im geting a new one soon any way.)
my system specs

P4 3.0(C)GHz
512MB PC-3200 RAM(To be Replaced by 1GB Corsair XMS Series Memoery)
Radeon 9200, (To be replaced by an X800XT. Or 2x6800Ultras if I win a constest :p)
160GB HD(I'm getting another 250GB HD)

It runs Freelancer fine maxed out.. sometimes it will hit 20FPS for a while.. but thats fine for now..

luky basterd. you have a computer that could woop mine without trying. hay think i could have you video card when you get the new one. i think any thing is better then intel extream 2d/3d graphics bla bla bla. extream i dont think so. they would be good for people that what a sever and dont what to buy a gpu. as long as you dont run the game on it.

later


p.s dont look behind u