Centurion or Hammerhead

Sun May 18, 2003 10:51 pm by Crunchodile-

which is better?
please give reasons

Thanks

Mon May 19, 2003 1:37 am by Unpro

Hammerhead..

Much much faster.

Mon May 19, 2003 11:01 am by Pinger

Hammerhead

1. as the Centurion looses weapons when it looses wings so gets expensive.
2. HH seems to me to present the firepower better, so easier to fight with.

Mon May 19, 2003 4:51 pm by TheJkWhoSaysNi

If the hammerhead could use level 10 weapons.. i'd use it for fighting. Sadly it cant

-----------------------
WARNING: THIS POST MAY CONTAIN TRACES OF PEANUT

Mon May 19, 2003 5:43 pm by NukeIt

Hammerhead>Centurion. Bounty Hunter ships are decently maneuverable, Corsair ships fly like cinderblocks.

Reaper: $200,000,000.
Rockets: $100,000
The look on that pilot's face when you launch a full pod of screamers up his tailpipe: priceless

Mon May 19, 2003 6:59 pm by Du7andal

Not true in my opinion. I've noticed that that the Legionnaire was much more manouverable than the Pirrana. But that's just my opinion.

-----------------------------------------------------------
My conviction is like an arrow in flight, your life will only last until it reaches you.

--7--

Mon May 19, 2003 8:38 pm by Artic

Your doing something serously wrong then.

Mon May 19, 2003 9:10 pm by NJS The Great

I prefer the Centurion, dont ask me why but i never really liked the Bounty Hunter ships...

But I dont get to use it much cause if you save up a little over 100k more then you can get a class 10 ship.

Important Message

You are browsing the archived Lancers Reactor forums. You cannot register or login.
The content may be outdated and links may not be functional.

To get the latest in Freelancer news, mods, modding and downloads, go to
The-Starport