Wed Sep 17, 2003 10:26 pm by WapCaplet
Not sure what the laws are in other countries, but my understanding in Canada is that when you purchase software, you are allowed to have one, and only one copy of that software on any given PC at any given time. IE, if you purchased, oh let's say, Freelancer, and you wanted to, oh I don't know, lend it to your brother in Iraq, you would be legally responsible to completely remove the copy the exists on your hard drive. If you wanted to play it again, you would have to retrieve the CD from your brother, ensure that he completely removes it from his harddrive, and then reinstall on your hard drive.
What's my point? My point is that even though you say it's a "legitimate" situation ("I own the game! I just lent it to my brother!), you are still requesting assistance in an illegal activity. If you installed a no-cd patch in order to play the game, this would mean there are now two copies of Freelancer running, one on your PC and one on your brother's. But you only purchased one copy.
Ergo, there should exist no legal situation where a no-cd patch is required. If you lose the game or lend it away, that's your problem. The rest of real life doesn't have "no-cd" patches. Could you imagine:
"Excuse me Mr. Gas-Station-Attendant, but I lent my wallet to my brother in Iraq and I need to buy some gas for my car here. Since it really is MY car, can I just fill up for free using the no-money feature?"
"Excuse me Mr. Locksmith, but I lost my house keys. Clearly, you can see that this is MY house. So could you kindly replace my house keys for free. Thank you."
In real life, when you lose something or lend it away, it's your problem. If you need to replace it, you have to pay for it.
My 2 cents.
Wap