Important Message

You are browsing the archived Lancers Reactor forums. You cannot register or login.
The content may be outdated and links may not be functional.


To get the latest in Freelancer news, mods, modding and downloads, go to
The-Starport

Miniature jet engines could power cellphones

This is where you can discuss your homework, family, just about anything, make strange sounds and otherwise discuss things which are really not related to the Lancer-series. Yes that means you can discuss other games.

Post Wed Oct 20, 2004 2:11 pm

Miniature jet engines could power cellphones

Engineers have moved a step closer to batch producing miniaturised, jet engine-based generators from a single stack of bonded silicon wafers. These chip-based “microengines” could one day power mobile electronic devices.

By spinning a tiny magnet above a mesh of interleaved coils etched into a wafer, David Arnold and Mark Allen of the Georgia Institute of Technology, US, have built the first silicon-compatible device capable of converting mechanical energy - produced by a rotating microturbine - into usable amounts of electrical energy.

The key advantage of microengines is that they pack in at least 10 times more energy per volume of fuel than conventional lithium batteries, take up less space and work more smoothly than much-touted fuel cells.

“Jet engines are remarkable pieces of equipment in terms of efficiency,” explains Stuart Jacobson at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, US, who collaborates with Arnold and Allen.

“For the first time we have got macro-sized amounts of energy from a micro-scale device,” says Arnold. This is a crucial if micro-engines are to find their way into actual products, Allen adds.


Off-the-shelf components

Until now, two separate teams, led by Jacobson and Carlos Fernandez-Pello at the University of California in Berkeley, US, have focused on how to convert the chemical energy stored in the diesel fuel into the mechanical energy that drives the turbine - the first part of the microengine process.

Both have already etched prototype silicon combustion chambers capable of burning diesel at very high temperatures without cracking, and miniature silicon turbines, using batch-scale manufacture techniques. But they captured the electrical energy produced using off-the-shelf components that were not part of the same stack of silicon wafers.

Now, for the first time, Arnold and Allen have demonstrated that the generation of electricity from the spinning turbine can actually be done on a silicon-compatible wafer.

They spin a flat metal ring - about the diameter of a penny - made up of alternating 45° sections of magnetic north and south poles. For the sake of the experiment, the micro-turbine was replaced by an air-powered drill like those used by dentists.

As the magnet spins, its rapidly switching magnetic field induces a current in metal coils deposited on an etched ferromagnetic layer underneath. It produces 1.1 watts of power. This is already enough to power a cellphone or GPS receiver, says Arnold, and it is just in the research stage.


Brittle magnets

Achieving this power requires 100,000 revolutions per minute, extremely fast compared to car engines, which spin at just 3000 rpm. Magnets are brittle and tend to be pulled apart by the centrifugal force at high speeds, so Arnold and Allen optimised the thickness and width of the magnetic ring before encasing it in a layer of strengthening titanium.

They also had to work out the best dimensions for the three interleaving coils that sit below the spinning magnet and produce the current. They decided on an array about 100 microns tall, reducing electrical resistance as much as possible to ensure that the maximum current is squeezed out of each magnet rotation.

While the magnetic generator is an “exciting step”, the next hurdle is integrating the manufacture of the turbine, combustor and electricity generator into a single stack of bonded silicon wafers, says Mike Waits, an electrical engineer at the Army Research Lab in Adelphi, Maryland, which is funding the research.

The US Army expects that soldiers - who currently rely on battery-powered laptops, night-vision goggles and GPS systems - will be the first to use the microengines. "The army has a tremendous power problem - soldiers get bogged down by their batteries,” explains Jacobson.

Devices that run on diesel would be a boon for the army because it is widely available as tank fuel anyway, adds Waits.

Arnold and Allen will present their advance at the International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS) in January 2005.


Celeste Biever

Link

Post Wed Oct 20, 2004 4:26 pm

ok, so eventually these things could power my mp3 player, without batteries to die in the middle of a song, cool idea i hope they can get it to work

Post Wed Oct 20, 2004 4:36 pm

So I can just pull my computer up to the local gas station and fill 'er up? What size tank comes with an mp3 Player? I'd think it'd be hard to fit the pump nozzle in there...

Post Wed Oct 20, 2004 6:25 pm

I'm thinking fuel cell powered microengines.

Post Wed Oct 20, 2004 6:43 pm

I read about that yesterday. It seems like a good idea, but I still feel that fuel cells are probably the best option for powering laptops, etc.

Post Thu Oct 21, 2004 1:34 am

thats cool. but where would you keep the diesel? another bottle? what if you drop your cellphone and the diesel compartment cracks?

Post Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:44 am

"I'm thinking fuel cell powered microengines."

Wouldn't that be redundant? Fuel cells produce (if I'm not mistaken) electrical energy. These microturbines could conceivably convert this into mechanical energy but what would be the point? It would then have to be reconverted to electrical energy. Unless you could somehow have a net increase in energy it would make more sense to just use the electricity directly from the fuel cell. Maybe I'm missing something here, I don't know.


The key advantage of microengines is that they pack in at least 10 times more energy per volume of fuel than conventional lithium batteries, take up less space and work more smoothly than much-touted fuel cells.


Yeah, but how much room would the fuel take up?

Edited by - Codename on 10/21/2004 10:48:18 AM

Post Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:59 am

Well, when you combine hydrogen and oxygen to make water, you get both electricity and heat. I guess the question is which of these to results provides more power. I just assumed that the electrical discharge might not have as much oomph as say, heat to propel a turbine rotor.

But don't go by me. This is all just speculation on my part.

Post Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:03 am

I get it. Use the electricity as is and the heat - which I guess would otherwise just be vented or something - to power the turbines and create more electricity. That makes sense.

Return to Off Topic