Important Message

You are browsing the archived Lancers Reactor forums. You cannot register or login.
The content may be outdated and links may not be functional.


To get the latest in Freelancer news, mods, modding and downloads, go to
The-Starport

there were no words, and no movements but the tearing of tee

This is where you can discuss your homework, family, just about anything, make strange sounds and otherwise discuss things which are really not related to the Lancer-series. Yes that means you can discuss other games.

Post Sat Oct 16, 2004 7:07 am

there were no words, and no movements but the tearing of tee

This time out of Lord of the Flies, writing about that as well On wednesday, also 30 marks
It seems that most of you know this book, I'd like some opinions about it please.
Interesting thoughts important stuff that happens etc.
Maybe who you think Ralph, Piggy , Jack and Simon and the little uns represent, just as long as it won't lead to a political discussion.


As well, can the boys really be held responsibel for Simon's death?
Why did Roger kill Pig
Would a group of adults have fared better in a situation like this?


Sigs are so overrated. I would never think of us..uhm nevermind
linky

Edited by - studying_warrior on 10/16/2004 8:12:03 AM

Post Sat Oct 16, 2004 7:09 am

i think this is repersention of a us falling back to our basic urges. freud would get a field day out of the book. personaly it could repersent the workings of a school. becuase often in schools i will think that in a power society like this, it must be the way neolithic people lived. me i like the book, and i am sure taw will have some good insights to share with us

Edited by - [UTFDSQrn on 10/16/2004 8:10:03 AM

Edit: also i think the creator of the book probably had some childhood stories we dont want to hear. and if anyone is wonderign the way kids end up making 'goverments' and 'rulerships' email me....

Edited by - [UTFDSQrn on 10/16/2004 8:11:26 AM

Post Sat Oct 16, 2004 7:17 am

Ehm afaik he wrote the book to show people how we are inheritantly bad, that we all have evil in us, I think I got the notes on that here somewhere. But mail your thingy in anyway plz
But I think what he has done most of all is make people think, this is one of the best books I have ever read.

Something interesting I just read, Simon and Piggy both dies after they shatter the others illusiiions and show them the reality.
Could this possibly show that people in genaral do not WANT to hear the thruth that they LIKE living in a illusion? Prolly where the saying Ignorance is bliss comes from

Post Sat Oct 16, 2004 7:23 am

sure give me 1/2 a hour to mail it.

Post Sat Oct 16, 2004 7:28 am

why are we doing your course work for you? will you do my buying and out-of-stock reports and price comparisons for me?

Post Sat Oct 16, 2004 7:30 am

ok I will
its not coursework its hints and help for my final exam which is Wednesday
I find it absolutely idiotic that we have to study a whole book for 30 marks

Post Sat Oct 16, 2004 6:08 pm


Would a group of adults have fared better in a situation like this?


The presumption is "yes" but the implied answer is "no." The book, as a whole is supposed to be allegorical in nature and a reflection of the human condition, adults included.

Post Sat Oct 16, 2004 6:40 pm

Furthermore the general consensus it that children have a certain amount of innocence (the "Blank Slate" theory). If even innocent children are unable to work together, what does that say about adults who, in various ways, have been socialized to be selfish? As I see it the entire thesis of the book is that society is required to keep people under control as without it you simply have chaos.

If you really want to impress your teacher try talking about a "Hobbesian State of Nature".

Post Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:07 am

My teacher won't be marking it, because it is final exam it gets sent away to I-dont-know-where and some unknown person mark it, we're not even allowed to write our names or the schools name on it, we're being reduced to numbers...

Something interesting I've read, is that Golding took children because they are not yet conditioned in society and because of that they can move away from set society more easily. Or sth like that in anyways
Something else that was interesting that I read was that despite it seeming so it wasn't a happy ending

Return to Off Topic