Important Message

You are browsing the archived Lancers Reactor forums. You cannot register or login.
The content may be outdated and links may not be functional.


To get the latest in Freelancer news, mods, modding and downloads, go to
The-Starport

Charitable society.....only if poor already!!!

This is where you can discuss your homework, family, just about anything, make strange sounds and otherwise discuss things which are really not related to the Lancer-series. Yes that means you can discuss other games.

Post Sun Jun 27, 2004 2:07 am

Charitable society.....only if poor already!!!

Poor people give more to charity than the wealthy, research has revealed.

Council house residents give most, while affluent households find they have the least to spare, the study for The Giving Campaign found.

The most charitable towns were revealed to be Sunderland, Blackpool and Motherwell, even though all three are among the poorest in the country - with Sunderland ranked fifth poorest.

Affluent London, ranked 23 in terms of wealth, had the least number of donors among its busy population.

Amanda Delew, director of The Giving Campaign, said: "It is staggering to think that, although the better-off have more money than ever before, it is the poorer people in society who are giving their money away to good causes."

The research also revealed a clear North-South divide, with generous northerners giving far more than their southern counterparts.

Towns were ranked by wealth from 1 to 114 for the research carried out by Experian, with Guildford in Surrey being the wealthiest and the Welsh town of Llandrindod Wells the poorest. Guildford languished near the bottom of the giving pile (107) while Llandrindod Wells came higher at 72.

The average wealth within the 10 most charitable towns was found to be significantly lower than the national average.

The 10 towns with the lowest number of donors have an average wealth of twice the national average.

Ms Delew added: "I'd like to see people across the UK working to generate a culture of giving, where it is natural for people - particularly the wealthy - to give generously towards the good causes they care about."

Post Sun Jun 27, 2004 2:08 am

imo the poor gives more because they know what it feels like to be poor, the rich dont know, so they dont care

Post Sun Jun 27, 2004 2:15 am

does this include the National lottery element or not?

Post Sun Jun 27, 2004 2:18 am

I would agree about that in giving to beggars and stuff - heck, i am poor - but even i find myself thinking "I work damned hard for my money - and i am not giving away 10mins of my time to you! (rate of pay - well, nearly ).

However, its for charities, like cancer research, and hospices and more around the country that this is referring too. The sort of things that SHOULD attract donations from those with cash to flash....

I have a monthly donation to Cancer research UK, as do my parents (totals only about 150 quid a year between us), but we still give. However, i know ALOT of young well off people who wouldn't dream of charity donations (to established charities - not beggars!), and i have no idea why. They earn in excess of 30-40k a year each doing reasonably hard working city jobs (London), but even if they are out with me on the lamb (who earns around 1/3 of their wages), they still try to sponge more drinks off me than the return!!!!!

Its just REALLY strange.

It doesn't inlcude nat lot as far as i know, but its only AOL quick news

Edited by - Chips on 6/27/2004 3:18:45 AM

Post Sun Jun 27, 2004 2:28 am

you see, it's not like giving to charities actually has to cost you anything. You covenant your tax, which means that a big part of what you have to shell out in Income Tax can be diverted to the charity of your choice. Mrs Taw does it for Plan International, a 3rd World developement charity, mine goes to the RNLI (Royal National Lifeboat Institution) - the covenanter doesnt lose a bean.

Post Sun Jun 27, 2004 6:12 pm

You can deduct gifts to charity from your taxes here too.

I've heard lots of explanations of why this is true, about the less privileged the more charitable. I think it is because the less privileged are emotionally "closer" to the needy as in the "there but for the grace of God go I" outlook.

zlo

Post Mon Jun 28, 2004 2:22 am

I have 2 percent of my taxes transfered to a local bridge club (because this does not cost me anything and because my firend is running it). Otherwise, no donations. Either the folks buy drinks for the money (which I can do myself) or you still don't know where your cash goes (and I prefer to know). I don't believe in those "charity saves lives" slogans.

Wisdom comes with age. But sometimes age comes alone...

Post Mon Jun 28, 2004 11:39 pm

i give to the salvos and the rsl on anzac da and rememberance day. the legacy pins are great for poking people.
-:-
Vi

Post Tue Jun 29, 2004 10:31 am

Charity? But, isn't that like throwing away money? Why not just spend it on yourself? Why should one not improve his own quality of life? This crus is always un-understandable!

Post Tue Jun 29, 2004 10:39 am

Parsimoniousness, while not the single defining quality seems to be represented abundantly among the rich.

Old Man Rockefeller was famous for his skinflint ways. Even after he became a huge millionaire, he had his shirt collars and cuffs reversed to extend the useful life of his wardrobe. This practice (collars and cuffs) seems to be genetic as David Rockefeller proudly did the same,

Since the object of gaining wealth happens to be an exercise in amassing gobs of money and things of value, it stands to reason that being stingy is a material plus.

Post Tue Jun 29, 2004 2:15 pm

presumably thence comes the association of extreme thriftiness with presumed hidden wealth, to with the many urban legends of tramps and quasi-hermits who are found to have substantial fortunes.

..She looks like the real thing
She tastes like the real thing
My fake plastic love...

Return to Off Topic