Important Message

You are browsing the archived Lancers Reactor forums. You cannot register or login.
The content may be outdated and links may not be functional.


To get the latest in Freelancer news, mods, modding and downloads, go to
The-Starport

Smokers - DON''T Look Here

This is where you can discuss your homework, family, just about anything, make strange sounds and otherwise discuss things which are really not related to the Lancer-series. Yes that means you can discuss other games.

Post Fri May 28, 2004 11:34 am

Smokers - DON''T Look Here

Latest update on research from the US Surgeon General's office on the disease list connected with tobacco smokng.

See post below.

Post Fri May 28, 2004 11:35 am

From the NY Times

U.S. Lengthens the List of Diseases Linked to Smoking
By ELIZABETH OLSON

Published: May 28, 2004

WASHINGTON, May 27 - Four decades after the surgeon general's first report on smoking and health linked cigarette use to lung cancer, larynx cancer and bronchitis, the latest annual report has further expanded the list of smoking-related diseases.

The new report, issued Thursday by Surgeon General Richard H. Carmona, concludes that in addition to the many other diseases listed in the intervening years, smoking can cause cancers of the cervix, kidney, pancreas and stomach, as well as abdominal aortic aneurysms, acute myeloid leukemia, cataracts, pneumonia and gum disease.

The report, Dr. Carmona said at a news briefing, "documents that smoking causes disease in nearly every organ in the body at every stage of life."

Among the other disorders listed since the first report, in 1964, are cancers of the esophagus, throat and bladder; chronic lung disease; and chronic heart and cardiovascular diseases.

Government figures show that 440,000 Americans a year are now dying of smoking-related illnesses, and Dr. Carmona said more than 12 million had died since the first report. Smokers typically die 13 to 14 years earlier than nonsmokers, he said.

Treating those diseases costs about $75 billion a year, according to government figures, and an even greater amount is sacrificed in lost productivity.

For the first time, however, the number of Americans who have quit smoking edges out the number who still smoke, the surgeon general said. An estimated 46 million Americans "have managed to beat the habit and quit,'' he said, "while 45.8 million continue to smoke." Of the entire adult population, people 18 or older, smokers now account for only 22 percent.

Still, Dr. Carmona conceded that at the current rate of decline, the federal government would not meet its goal of cutting the number of smokers to 12 percent of adults by 2010.

The report warned that while the number of high school seniors who smoke had been reduced to 24.4 percent last year from 36.5 percent in 1997, trends indicated that the rate of decline in smoking among youths, like that among adults, was slowing.

The surgeon general said that "every day, nearly 5,000 people under 18 years of age try their first cigarette."

Just as disturbing as those trends, the report said, is that the rate of smoking "among some racial and ethnic minority populations and among less-educated Americans remains high.''

Dr. Carmona said he hoped that the message that "toxins from cigarette smoke go everywhere the blood flows" would help "motivate people to quit smoking and convince young people not to start in the first place."

Quitting can have immediate as well as long-term benefits, the report found. Quitting at age 65 or older, it said, can reduce by nearly 50 percent the risk of dying of a smoking-related disease. On the other hand, former smokers have the same stroke risk as nonsmokers 5 to 15 years after quitting.

Smoking cigarettes with lower yields of tar and nicotine, the report said, do not substantially reduce the risk of lung cancer.

"There is no safe cigarette," Dr. Carmona said, "whether it is called 'light,' 'ultralight' or any other name."

The 941-page report was prepared by a team of 20 scientists at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and drew on research reported in 1,600 articles, which are available at www.cdc.gov/tobacco.

It found that while some research had pointed to an association between smoking and diseases including colon, liver and prostate cancer, as well as erectile dysfunction, the current evidence was not sufficient to establish a link.

Post Fri May 28, 2004 12:18 pm

and they complain when i spam

Post Fri May 28, 2004 12:42 pm

It's a real shame, too. People now know this and they still choose to smoke. Is it their right to? Arguably, but it's just such a waste. So many deaths, so many wasted government bailouts and subsidies, such a total waste. --- VH16

Post Fri May 28, 2004 1:46 pm

yes, but consider the $100,000,000 a year the companies make, which can be used to influence governments..

Post Fri May 28, 2004 3:19 pm

I still think if you offered the farmer 2 tax free years if he will switch to a differnt crop, it will curtail supply a little. And in that our gas prices are soaring, plant corn and restart the ethonal(sp) fuel alternative again.

Post Sat May 29, 2004 3:02 am

ok thats a post about smoking and a post about high cholesterol - are you trying to make a point to anyone in particular, Ed?

..how I dearly wish I was not here..

Post Sat May 29, 2004 4:21 am

He wouldn't do a think like that!

They had this on the news yesterday. I'm surprised that it has taken them so long to find more links to diseases, as there have been rumours around about the links between smoking and many of those maladies for years.

Post Sat May 29, 2004 4:35 am

maybe they where too busy trying to get a cat with buttered toast strapped to its back to hover in order to generate power.

Post Sat May 29, 2004 4:39 am

Maybe ff, but if so, it took them an abnormally long time to disprove it .

Post Sat May 29, 2004 4:40 am

maybe they where looking for the cat to hover so it can power the perfect sandcastle.

Post Sat May 29, 2004 6:53 am

Well I did warn smokers away from this thread and the other one was directed at the nonsense of suing someone for willingly undertaking to ingest high fat/high cholesterol content food and then suing someone for ending up with high cholesterol and high fat related clogged arteries.

Post Sat May 29, 2004 10:53 am

believe me I won't be suing anyone for the choices I made myself through life. So I have a bad heart, clogged arteries and bloodclots on me lungs? my own fault, no-one else's. These pathetic losers who sue anyone for anything that happens to them in life make me sick.

..how I dearly wish I was not here..

Return to Off Topic