Important Message

You are browsing the archived Lancers Reactor forums. You cannot register or login.
The content may be outdated and links may not be functional.


To get the latest in Freelancer news, mods, modding and downloads, go to
The-Starport

Picasso''s 1905 "Boy With A Pipe" Auctioned For $1

This is where you can discuss your homework, family, just about anything, make strange sounds and otherwise discuss things which are really not related to the Lancer-series. Yes that means you can discuss other games.

Post Thu May 06, 2004 9:11 am

Picasso''s 1905 "Boy With A Pipe" Auctioned For $1

So, in 1905, when he was 24, Picasso painted a shop's apprentice teenager wearing traditional French blue coveralls and holding a clay pipe.

By 1936, the painting wound up in an art gallery in NYC where the famously wealthy and art supporting Whitneys bought it for $70,000 plus another $7,000 in sales tax.

From 1936, it stayed with the Whitneys until the the wife died in 1998. From which time the heirs had debated what to do with the entire estate's collection.

And so all the art worth selling was auctioned this week and the Picasso broke the record of most expensive bid price made by an anonymous bidder represented by Sotheby North America's Chairman, Warren Weitman, Jr.

No one knows whether this painting will go to a museum or disappear again into private hands.



As a well known Picasso biographer has been quoted to say: "No painting is worth $100,000,000."

Post Thu May 06, 2004 9:15 am

Jeez why someone would pay that much for a painting i have no idea even though its by one of the worlds greatest artists

I am the Master of Disaster!!!!!!!!

Post Thu May 06, 2004 9:30 am

All the top painters pictures are UGLY!!!!!!

Post Thu May 06, 2004 11:58 am

Not for a picasso though - sorry, there are ALOT more valuable paintings around the world.....personally

However, apart from paying a massively massive price like that - usually art will never lose its value.......so its a fairly safe investment, as long as you didn't pay a ridiculous sum to start with. This is an exceedingly high price, but if you have the cash to splash (remember, they don't accept collateral etc - it needs to be actual bank balance - and not value of your company/house etc to pay!!!) - then 100mil is probs not too much money at all. Finding an insurance company for it would be more fun i would imagine

Post Thu May 06, 2004 1:08 pm

Not that I know of, no. But our fine arts practice keeps mum on everything they do.... goes without saying I suppose

Post Thu May 06, 2004 1:09 pm

taw i didn't say he wasn't a great artist i'm just saying why someone would pay that kind of money for a painting is beyond me



Edited by - Gowserpaul on 5/6/2004 2:09:25 PM

Post Thu May 06, 2004 1:29 pm

I wouldn't pay that much money for that. I never really understood Picasso's paintings, I mean, really my little sister could do better than some of his work. (No offense Taw).

Post Thu May 06, 2004 1:31 pm

thx taw i've never really had much of an understanding of art but that's helped a lot

Post Thu May 06, 2004 2:15 pm

Well,

This definitely is Lloyd's material. Costs usually get quoted on a units or partial units per thousand basis. Depends on the new owner, actually. The cost for stuff like this often gets tied to the specific characteristics of "risk" which, in this case, necessarily includes the owner.

Probably ends up involving an annual cost in the lowest 6 figures if quoted in US money. Very high 5 figures in UK money. Because I assume that the buyer is a known quantity in the insurance end of it and already has a "book" of business placed with the most likely underwriters.

Post Thu May 06, 2004 3:19 pm

Love picasso's stuff and who wouldn't want this hanging in their luxury penthouse suit. But 104 Million? No painting is worth that much, it's pure extravegance for the filthy rich to say "look how filthy rich I am". Though I suspect this painting was bought with the intention of it being a sound investment.

Post Thu May 06, 2004 3:40 pm

Almost all the stuff on this site artwork related beats a picasso

Post Thu May 06, 2004 5:18 pm

go away supersnipa....you have no taste for art....and you just spam the forums here to obtain a high rank....which just explains the amount of spam you do....it does not determine the amount of respect you receive here....noob slap!!!

Post Thu May 06, 2004 5:26 pm

While the various artists are interesting, I am mainly a fan of landscape paintings. Now if someone wants to point to a painter of these, then money may talk.

Post Thu May 06, 2004 6:12 pm

Monet would be your man then fd, he's a personal favourite of mine.

Post Thu May 06, 2004 6:16 pm

I lucked out once and got to see ALL the Water Lilies panels setup to surround the viewer. Wow. I wanted to sit there all day but couldn't.

Return to Off Topic