Important Message

You are browsing the archived Lancers Reactor forums. You cannot register or login.
The content may be outdated and links may not be functional.


To get the latest in Freelancer news, mods, modding and downloads, go to
The-Starport

An interesting thought....

This is where you can discuss your homework, family, just about anything, make strange sounds and otherwise discuss things which are really not related to the Lancer-series. Yes that means you can discuss other games.

Post Mon May 03, 2004 7:28 pm

Right now, this is a man's world. Now, I think women can rise to power, but I don't think they can be very feminin. They have to have a guys attitude.

Some chick friends of mine told me this plan to take over the world:

Step One: Bate cages with computer games, porn, cake, and beer.
Step Two: Transfer captured men to larger cages with a TV with all the channels, a high proformance comp with tons of games, a fridge full of beer, food, and cake, a couch, a bed, porn and a giant hampster wheel.

20min of running on the hamster wheel = 2 hours of power. Their is also a hole that men can drop down into a giant hamster ball and run around an underground maze.

The men also get sex from the women, when they feel like it.

Personaly, I can't wait for it

Life: No one gets out alive.

Post Mon May 03, 2004 7:36 pm

In NZ we have a female prime minister. Things aren't all bad, although she has made a few screw-ups. That and she cried on Waitangi Day.

It's an axe, I use it to...hack at people

You'd be surprised how much it costs to look this cheap

Post Mon May 03, 2004 8:20 pm

Waitangi Day?

Life: No one gets out alive.

Post Mon May 03, 2004 9:21 pm

It's to 'celebrate' the signing of the treaty of Waitangi between the British and the Maoris. Every time it rolls around there are big protests, I don't know why people waste their day off but oh well, to each their own. Anyways, the PM was being yelled at or something to that effect and broke down and cried.

It's an axe, I use it to...hack at people

You'd be surprised how much it costs to look this cheap

zlo

Post Mon May 03, 2004 11:15 pm

Well, showing emotions may also be considered as a positive thing, bringing the person in power closer to 'common' people.
speaking of women in charge, I don't care as long as they do the job. I wonder if a woman, say, president would be less likely to start a war, since women are believed to be less aggressive and territorial. Dunno for sure, tho.

An idea came to my head and is now desperately searching for brain

Post Tue May 04, 2004 12:58 am

errmm, do you remember Margaret Thatcher, zlo? she was more territorial and aggressive than most men. Now of course she's just a mad old baglady found wandering around genteel areas of Sarf Lahndahn..

Post Tue May 04, 2004 1:30 am

women already believe they ARE in charge

Post Tue May 04, 2004 6:35 am

Thatcher took a potshot at Blair in the news just the other week; she seems to be doing okay

" In Defeat, Malice; In Victory, Revenge! "

Post Tue May 04, 2004 6:56 am

Women are quite territorial. Have you seen Species?

I've also seen quite a few books on the "Teenage Slut". Basicaly, it says that girls don't like this person because they have the possability of taking their boyfriend away. There are many other instances in which women are terretorial...but i'd take too long to write.

Post Tue May 04, 2004 7:09 am

Yeah... these days the government is too weak to make major changes to the system, particularly if it would divide the population. If a government became sexist, especially against men, the more militant sex, it would need a HELL of a lotta firepower, otherwise it'd be gone in a week.
Stalin could've done it though, not that he would... shame the Soviet Unions dead now... there was a great nation.

Corsair#01takes no responsiblity for any Spam created or endorsed by Corsair#01 Postings Limited.
SMILIES UNITE!
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[
<pre><font size=1 face=Courier><font size=1 face=Courier>So this is what the code button does... </font> </font></pre>


Edited by - ~Corsair#01~ on 5/4/2004 8:11:02 AM

Post Tue May 04, 2004 9:58 am

I was reading the Dilbert Future only yesterday, there's quite a funny chapter where Adams discusses how women already control the world. His reasoning sounds very convincing. This is just one part of it:

"If you don't believe that women spend most of the money, just walk into any Sears story and see what they're selling. If you're a male, you see maybe two things you might want - a second cordless drill (so you have a spare), and a trickle charger, because you like how they look in the garage. That's all you want. But someone has to be buying everything else, or Sears would go out of business. Kids don't have money. Pets aren't allowed in. By process of elimination, it's women spending all the money and therefore dictating how the men have to live"

Post Tue May 04, 2004 9:59 am

Uhmm well...I guess it depends on the kind of woman, it would actually be good if they could get a person with the combined qualities of a man and woman, a man has certain personality trades which is needed and a woman has other

But you know what they say behind every man there is a woman so we rule da world in anyway

cast a side-long glance to Esqs sig..one of these days...

The other day you told me to choose between you and the world...I chose the world and you walked away not knowing that you are my world
sycho_warrior
Forum Systems

Post Tue May 04, 2004 10:08 am


behind every man there is a woman


you missed a bit,

"behind which is another man, staring at her @ss..."

Post Tue May 04, 2004 10:10 am

lol note STARING not supporting or telling what to do staring...there is a huge dif

Post Tue May 04, 2004 11:29 am

I was raised in a house where women are better then men in all respects. So, for me, girls already rule the world.

Life: No one gets out alive.



Edited by - RILMS on 5/4/2004 9:25:34 PM

Return to Off Topic