Important MessageYou are browsing the archived Lancers Reactor forums. You cannot register or login. |
AMD VS> INTEL
This is where you can discuss your homework, family, just about anything, make strange sounds and otherwise discuss things which are really not related to the Lancer-series. Yes that means you can discuss other games.
63 posts
• Page 3 of 5 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
How about an old Cryx machine. I just ran accross one *free* and it has 30mgs ram, 3.0 gig hard drive, no vid card. about 500 mghtz speed. Anyone using Linux recomment a version that will run on this machine? It currently has *ducks any thackers* ME on it. I plan on doing away with that anyway.
Finalday
Habaq Mot / Aspazomai Thanatos / Capere Obitus... /Keith Green\ (1953-1983)
Finalday
Habaq Mot / Aspazomai Thanatos / Capere Obitus... /Keith Green\ (1953-1983)
It came preloaded with Win 98, so not too old. I did get a look at the ram and it is not PC-100. Looks like 72 pin older stuff. I may hav and extra I took out of another one a yar ago.
Finalday
Habaq Mot / Aspazomai Thanatos / Capere Obitus... /Keith Green\ (1953-1983)
Edited by - Finalday on 3/5/2004 4:10:14 PM
Finalday
Habaq Mot / Aspazomai Thanatos / Capere Obitus... /Keith Green\ (1953-1983)
Edited by - Finalday on 3/5/2004 4:10:14 PM
The comp is at work at the moment, so I will have to wait till monday to work on it. I has an older PCI Vid card I am going to put in it too and replace the older modem too. Monitor, keyboard, and mouse is all new. If I can reformat and test run Win 98se, I may buy a 40GB hard drive to play with. I really want to learn Linux.
Finalday
Habaq Mot / Aspazomai Thanatos / Capere Obitus... /Keith Green\ (1953-1983)
Edited by - Finalday on 3/5/2004 5:27:50 PM
Finalday
Habaq Mot / Aspazomai Thanatos / Capere Obitus... /Keith Green\ (1953-1983)
Edited by - Finalday on 3/5/2004 5:27:50 PM
My friend has an AMD 2600+ Barton (Mobile) running at 2.5Ghz (200x12.5=2500) with a 1.675VCore, with temps under 40C while running Small FFT's in Prime 95.
His PR for it (compared to Northwood "C" about 3400+, although AMD would call it a 3600+/3800+/
The CPU can do more, he says, but he needs better ram or a "better" motherboard.
AMD.
But I've got a Dell. At 2.4GHz.
Edit: AMD is evil! It's threatning the vision of 12 million Americans, man!!
Learn more about this blight upon the human race from the official website itself:
http://www.savingvision.org/
I had a super Ego, but it was pestering me so I killed it.
Edited by - BEvilR on 3/5/2004 7:27:35 PM
His PR for it (compared to Northwood "C" about 3400+, although AMD would call it a 3600+/3800+/
The CPU can do more, he says, but he needs better ram or a "better" motherboard.
AMD.
But I've got a Dell. At 2.4GHz.
Edit: AMD is evil! It's threatning the vision of 12 million Americans, man!!
Learn more about this blight upon the human race from the official website itself:
http://www.savingvision.org/
I had a super Ego, but it was pestering me so I killed it.
Edited by - BEvilR on 3/5/2004 7:27:35 PM
for anyone interested:
i have a very old computer, 486 processor(pentium i think, not sure), 32 Mb RAM, 2.8 Gb HDD that is only recognised as 1.99 because of, Win 95 + edition, buggy but reliable, busted network card, modem, graphics card(crappy), sound card, two inoperative USB ports.
Anyone want it for a history project?
yet, surprisingly enuff, i tried running Half life on it, and at the start, by the time i got to the station, the train was PART of the platform, yet valve says the game only needs a 133! very, very weird
i have a very old computer, 486 processor(pentium i think, not sure), 32 Mb RAM, 2.8 Gb HDD that is only recognised as 1.99 because of, Win 95 + edition, buggy but reliable, busted network card, modem, graphics card(crappy), sound card, two inoperative USB ports.
Anyone want it for a history project?
yet, surprisingly enuff, i tried running Half life on it, and at the start, by the time i got to the station, the train was PART of the platform, yet valve says the game only needs a 133! very, very weird
Hi Arania,
If it IS a 486 processor, no way it operates at anything higher than 100Mhz. Pentiums, if they had followed the numbering convention that Intel had started, would have been called "586" units.
Also, with 486es, you had to have got the DX or DX2 variety CPUs with built in floating point processing or your graphics will be cr*p. The SX units were only good for people who only sometimes did calculation based work and little or no graphics.
If it IS a 486 processor, no way it operates at anything higher than 100Mhz. Pentiums, if they had followed the numbering convention that Intel had started, would have been called "586" units.
Also, with 486es, you had to have got the DX or DX2 variety CPUs with built in floating point processing or your graphics will be cr*p. The SX units were only good for people who only sometimes did calculation based work and little or no graphics.
63 posts
• Page 3 of 5 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5